1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1961 Chevrolet Corvair
To start off, 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Chevrolet Corvair weights approximately 70 kg more than 1955 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin A 40 | 1961 Chevrolet Corvair | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 40 | Corvair |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2750 mm |
