1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1963 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1963 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Nissan Bluebird (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 40 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1963 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin A 40 | 1963 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2290 mm |
