1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1968 Renault 4
To start off, 1968 Renault 4 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin A 40 (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 40 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 40 | 1968 Renault 4 | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | 4 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 38 L |