1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (59 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 160 kg more than 1955 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1980 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 40 | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1955 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 79 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2530 mm |