1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 56 kg more than 1955 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 40 | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 40 | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1955 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2580 mm |