1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1982 Zastava 2101 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 2101 (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 2101 should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 40 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1982 Zastava 2101.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 2101 (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 2101 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 40 | 1982 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Austin | Zastava |
Model | A 40 | 2101 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2430 mm |