1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 40 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1983 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 40 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Austin | Zastava |
Model | A 40 | 102 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2160 mm |