1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1994 Renault Ludo

To start off, 1994 Renault Ludo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Renault Ludo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Renault Ludo (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Renault Ludo should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 40 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1994 Renault Ludo.

Because 1955 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Renault Ludo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Renault Ludo (107 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 1994 Renault Ludo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 40. 1994 Renault Ludo has automatic transmission and 1955 Austin A 40 has manual transmission. 1955 Austin A 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Renault Ludo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: