1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 440 kg more than 1955 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 40 | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1955 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2580 mm |