1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1997 Renault Helem

To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 469 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 620 kg more than 1955 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Renault Helem (85 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 1997 Renault Helem will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Austin A 40 1997 Renault Helem
Make Austin Renault
Model A 40 Helem
Year Released 1955 1997
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 1200 cc 2975 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 41 HP 510 HP
Torque 79 Nm 85 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 7.2:1 7.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1650 kg
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 80 L