1955 Austin A 40 vs. 2000 Isuzu Kai
To start off, 2000 Isuzu Kai is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Isuzu Kai is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Isuzu Kai is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu Kai will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Isuzu Kai has automatic transmission and 1955 Austin A 40 has manual transmission. 1955 Austin A 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Isuzu Kai will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 40 | 2000 Isuzu Kai | |
Make | Austin | Isuzu |
Model | A 40 | Kai |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |