1955 Austin A 40 vs. 2001 Isuzu ZXS
To start off, 2001 Isuzu ZXS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,165 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Isuzu ZXS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Isuzu ZXS (216 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Isuzu ZXS should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 40.
Because 2001 Isuzu ZXS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Isuzu ZXS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Isuzu ZXS (399 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 2001 Isuzu ZXS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 40. 2001 Isuzu ZXS has automatic transmission and 1955 Austin A 40 has manual transmission. 1955 Austin A 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Isuzu ZXS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 40 | 2001 Isuzu ZXS | |
Make | Austin | Isuzu |
Model | A 40 | ZXS |
Year Released | 1955 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 216 HP |
Torque | 79 Nm | 399 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |