1955 Austin A 40 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (130 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 40. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1955 Austin A 40 has manual transmission. 1955 Austin A 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin A 40 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Austin | Smart |
| Model | A 40 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 1867 mm |
