1955 Austin A 55 vs. 1995 Daewoo No 1
To start off, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo No 1 (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 55. (51 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1 should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 55.
Because 1955 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Daewoo No 1 (137 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 55. (110 Nm). This means 1995 Daewoo No 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 55. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 1955 Austin A 55 has manual transmission. 1955 Austin A 55 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 55 | 1995 Daewoo No 1 | |
Make | Austin | Daewoo |
Model | A 55 | No 1 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |