1955 Austin A 55 vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 55 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 31 kg more than 1955 Austin A 55.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 55. (110 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 55 | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 55 | Ram |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3020 mm |