1955 Austin A 55 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 55 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 55 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1955 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 55 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 55 | Clio |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2770 mm |