1955 Austin A 55 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 55. (51 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 153 kg more than 1955 Austin A 55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 55. (110 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 55. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1955 Austin A 55 has manual transmission. 1955 Austin A 55 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin A 55 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 55 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3260 mm |
