1955 Austin A 55 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU

To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 55. (51 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 850 kg more than 1955 Austin A 55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Austin A 55. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 55. (110 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 55. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU has automatic transmission and 1955 Austin A 55 has manual transmission. 1955 Austin A 55 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: