1955 Austin A 55 vs. 2000 Renault Clio

To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Clio (171 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 55. (51 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 55.

Because 1955 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 55. (110 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 55.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Austin A 55 2000 Renault Clio
Make Austin Renault
Model A 55 Clio
Year Released 1955 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1489 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 171 HP
Engine RPM 4250 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 110 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 5400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1055 kg 1055 kg
Vehicle Length 4250 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1570 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2480 mm