1955 Austin A 55 vs. 2012 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder (187 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 55. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 55.
Because 2012 Nissan Pathfinder is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Austin A 55. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Nissan Pathfinder has automatic transmission and 1955 Austin A 55 has manual transmission. 1955 Austin A 55 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Nissan Pathfinder will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 55 | 2012 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 55 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4884 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2850 mm |