1955 Austin A 90 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 90. (85 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 90.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 90. (168 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 90 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 90 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2640 mm |