1955 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1955 Austin-Healey 100 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey 100 (132 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1181 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey 100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey 100 | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Humber |
| Model | 100 | Pullman |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2658 cc | 4085 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 120 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 6.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 132 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 851 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3330 mm |
