1955 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1952 Bentley R Type Continental
To start off, 1955 Austin-Healey 100 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Bentley R Type Continental weights approximately 706 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey 100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey 100 | 1952 Bentley R Type Continental | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Bentley |
Model | 100 | R Type Continental |
Year Released | 1955 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 4566 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1651 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 81 L |