1955 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1995 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey 100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey 100 | 1995 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Jaguar |
Model | 100 | XJS |
Year Released | 1955 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 82 L |