1955 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. (132 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 949 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. (228 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey 100.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Austin-Healey 100 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Austin-Healey Jeep
Model 100 Grand Cherokee
Year Released 1955 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2658 cc 3966 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 132 HP 195 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 228 Nm 312 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 8.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 851 kg 1800 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 109 L 78 L