1955 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,658 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. (132 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey 100.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. (228 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey 100.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey 100 | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | 100 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2658 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 316 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 60 L |