1955 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. (132 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey 100.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey 100 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Audi |
| Model | 100 | A6 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2658 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 75 L |
