1955 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,658 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey 100 (132 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey 100.
Because 1955 Austin-Healey 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Austin-Healey 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey 100 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Volvo |
Model | 100 | C30 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2658 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 851 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 60 L |