1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 215 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Riley |
| Model | Sports Convertible | RM A |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2870 mm |
