1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1956 Toyota Master RR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (105 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 240 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
| Model | Sports Convertible | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2540 mm |
