1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 160 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 431 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (191 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
Model | Sports Convertible | Celica |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 622 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2440 mm |