1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 142 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (191 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | Sports Convertible | CTS |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 298 Nm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2890 mm |