1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (464 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 359 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 420 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (575 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Jaguar |
Model | Sports Convertible | XJ |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 464 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 575 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3157 mm |