1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1980 Citroen CX
To start off, 1980 Citroen CX is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 105 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 305 kg more than 1980 Citroen CX.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Citroen CX. (152 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1980 Citroen CX | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Citroen |
| Model | Tickford | CX |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2750 mm |
