1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1984 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1984 Ford Tempo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 425 kg more than 1984 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1984 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Tickford | Tempo |
Year Released | 1955 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2540 mm |