1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1984 Renault R5
To start off, 1984 Renault R5 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1984 Renault R5. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault R5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 810 kg more than 1984 Renault R5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault R5. (76 Nm). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault R5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1984 Renault R5 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
| Model | Tickford | R5 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1527 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 76 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 720 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2440 mm |
