1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1986 Renault 21
To start off, 1986 Renault 21 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1986 Renault 21. (75 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 575 kg more than 1986 Renault 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 21. (129 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 21.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1986 Renault 21 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Tickford | 21 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 129 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2670 mm |