1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1991 Buick Regal
To start off, 1991 Buick Regal is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 190 kg more than 1991 Buick Regal.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1991 Buick Regal | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Buick |
| Model | Tickford | Regal |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2740 mm |
