1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (93 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 535 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1991 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
| Model | Tickford | Clio |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2480 mm |
