1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1992 Lada Samara
To start off, 1992 Lada Samara is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1992 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1992 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 610 kg more than 1992 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1992 Lada Samara | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Lada |
| Model | Tickford | Samara |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1288 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5550 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 98 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2470 mm |
