1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 564 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | Tickford | Midge |
Year Released | 1955 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |