1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1999 Ford 021 C
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 232 kg more than 1999 Ford 021 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1999 Ford 021 C | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Tickford | 021 C |
Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 146 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |