1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2002 Holden Barina
To start off, 2002 Holden Barina is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Barina (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 470 kg more than 2002 Holden Barina.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Barina. (165 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2002 Holden Barina | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
Model | Tickford | Barina |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2500 mm |