1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2002 Kia Rio
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 510 kg more than 2002 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2002 Kia Rio | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Kia |
Model | Tickford | Rio |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 113 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2420 mm |