1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2004 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2004 Nissan Titan is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Titan weights approximately 868 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2004 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Tickford | Titan |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 514 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2398 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3560 mm |