1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 980 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Land Rover |
Model | Tickford | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2890 mm |