1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 245 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Tickford | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2960 mm |