1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2006 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2006 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Land Rover |
| Model | Tickford | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 216 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 365 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2890 mm |
