1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star (110 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 360 kg more than 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star. (157 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tickford | Space Star |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2510 mm |