1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2009 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2009 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | Tickford | SRX |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 254 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |